Bethlehem, Pa. — Two Lehigh University engineers presented a versatile and novel technique that is the first to factor in so many elements, demonstrate its effectiveness on transportation network recovery in imagined post-earthquake San Diego. Some problems, said Paolo Bocchini, assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at Lehigh University, cannot be solved through intuition.
“If you are trying to solve a problem that has, say, 10 possible outcomes, you can probably find a way to figure out which one is optimal,” Bocchini said. “But what if the possible solutions number as high as 10 to the 120th power?”
To illustrate the size of that figure, 10 to the 120th power, in long form, is written as a “1” followed by 120 zeroes.
That is the massive number of possible recovery options with which civic leaders and engineers would be faced in the aftermath of a major catastrophic event, such as a hurricane or an earthquake.
“In a post-disaster recovery period, there may be one, large, very important bridge to repair that would take as long as a year to restore to full functionality,” Bocchini said. “During that year, you could restore four smaller bridges which might have an even greater impact on getting the city back up and running. So, how do you figure out which choice is optimal? Computational models that predict what might work for one bridge or five bridges, simply don’t work when you try to scale up to 100 bridges.”
To address this, Bocchini and his colleague Aman Karamlou, a doctoral assistant and structural engineering Ph.D. candidate, created a novel method that represents a major improvement in existing computational models and optimization methodologies. Their technique, Algorithm with Multiple-Input Genetic Operators — or AMIGO, for short — is described in a paper that was recently published in Engineering Structures.
Designed to consider very complex objectives while keeping computational costs down, AMIGO makes the search process more efficient and expedites the convergence rate (the speed at which the sequence approaches its limit). It does this by taking advantage of the additional data in the genetic operators which are used to guide the algorithm toward a solution.
San Diego simulation
To demonstrate the effectiveness of their algorithm, Bocchini and Karamlou conducted a large-scale numerical analysis using an imagined earthquake scenario in the City of San Diego, Calif.
They chose San Diego for the size of its transportation network — it contains 238 highway bridges — as well as its importance and value as a U.S. strategic port. The total value of the port’s imports and exports in 2013 has been estimated to be more than $7 billion.
The researchers identified the 80 bridges that would sustain the most serious damage based on the seismicity of the region, and used AMIGO to calculate the best restoration strategy.
In a post-disaster situation, after the initial emergency response, those responsible for the recovery of a city or region must plan a repair schedule that balances mid-term and long-term recovery goals. Because every action will have an impact on the recovery, the trade-offs of each possible action must be considered.
While the total number of feasible solutions in the imagined San Diego bridge network restoration scenario is considerably large, the results show that AMIGO managed to find a set of near optimal Pareto (a method of assessing a set of choices) solutions in a small number of trials (about 25 generations).
From the study: “Moreover, a new bridge recovery model is proposed. Compared to the previous studies, this recovery model is more realistic, as it takes advantage of the available restoration functions obtained by experts’ surveys and scaling factors that account for the bridge cost.”
The researchers compared the performance of their optimization formulation with their previous optimization techniques. The results show significant improvement both in terms of optimality of the solution and convergence rate.
“This is of great importance, since for large realistic networks, the traffic analysis procedure can be computationally very expensive,” they write. “Therefore, reducing the number of required generations for convergence can considerably affect the computational cost of the problem and make this approach finally applicable to real-size networks. Compared to previous formulations, the use of operational resource constraints and the new recovery model yield the generation of more realistic schedules.”